Käyttäjä:Langeland24

PenaPedia
Versio hetkellä 18. heinäkuuta 2013 kello 12.32 – tehnyt Langeland24 (keskustelu | muokkaukset) (The five best cities to be a chicken)
(ero) ← Vanhempi versio | Nykyinen versio (ero) | Uudempi versio → (ero)
Siirry navigaatioonSiirry hakuun

The five best cities to be a chicken

<html>File photo by Erika Schultz/The Seattle Times Remember when we told you to avoid keeping backyard chickens? Sounds like some of you disagreed. Seattle landed on Redfin s , a list the online real estate brokerage drew up by analyzing home listings over the past three months that included chicken enclosures as a feature.

we mean,Analysts question Microsoft app plans, silent on re, Portland was number one, followed by three California cities (Ventura,[1], San Diego, and Sacramento) and then Seattle.

Contrary to assumptions, urban chicken owners don t necessarily own large plots, according to Redfin. (O)n average, listings with chicken coops have smaller homes and smaller lots, but larger price tags. It appears some buyers are willing to pay a little more for a home with a henhouse. Along with the Redfin survey comes stupid foodies and hipsters who can t cope for large numbers of abandoned urban chickens. Take away the gibes and it s mostly a reminder of . The usual don t-take-this-as-scientific-proof-survey-caveats: Redfin s analysis only looked at markets it covers nationwide, so it s not all-inclusive. The numbers weren t calculated per capita,Nike Browns 3 Weeden white Game Jerseys, which makes it all the more impressive that Ventura, , did so well against Seattle, which is nearly six times the size. Keeping all that in mind, we asked the Redfin folks what the worst place would be to be a chicken. The surprising answer by their metrics was San Jose,[2], which is to be chicken friendly. Other low scorers were Las Vegas, Boston, and Miami. From the chicken s perspective,2012 Nike Bengals 14 DALTON Black Jerseys, I wonder if the best place to be a chicken might be Austin, TX that s .</html>