Käyttäjä:Rosenbe72
Protesters rally against Zimmerman verdict
<html>pcman wrote:
IRT Ronin on right verdict. I agree, The community organizers were actively supported by the DOJ funds, President Obama's support of Jayvon Martin, and other national state and city leaders who tried to prejudice the trial with their comments and efforts. Zimmerman should never have been brought to trial except for the efforts of these leaders who influence the state attorney general to force the trial on Sanford's political leaders. What a disgrace of politics on the justice system, typical of the Obama administration. The prosecutor tried to make the jurors believe the truth did not matter,Earnhardt to race at Kil_0, but the only thing that mattered was what they felt in their hearts. What a loser,[1], the prosecution. Zimmerman has every right to sue the city, state and national leadership for their wrongful prosecution,Board bases water charges on rate of quantity used Hawaii Ne,Nike Rams 55 Laurinaitis Grey Shadow Elite Jerseys, not to mention withholding of evidence by the prosecution. A disgrace in the justice system. on July 14,Atletico Madrid 7 Forlan white red jerseys,2013 | 03:34PM</html>
Add up the extra travel fees before you buy
<html>An iceberg floats in the sea near Disko Island, Greenland.(AP Photo/Brennan Linsley) I’ve been daydreaming about going to Greenland, of seeing its other-worldly wilderness of icebergs and glaciers before they’re gone (thank you, climate change). ?So I thumbed through an enticing-looking brochure from an expedition-cruise company called Adventure Canada, a family-run business that takes travelers on small-ship cruises to remote northern places such as Canada’s Arctic, Scotland, Greenland and more. ??? One cruise, called Greenland Wild Labrador, looked enticing. The price for the Sept. 5-18 cruise: $3,995 per person (that’s in the cheapest stateroom which is, ahem, a quad with bunk beds; a two-berth room would be a dizzying $6,695 per person). Still, not all that bad for a 118-passenger ship that would cruise to Canada’s wild Labrador coast and to Greenland. And I wasn’t looking for a luxury cruise nor planning to spend much time in the stateroom. ? ?But then I began toting up the extra charges as outlined in the 2013 brochure. And I ended up with sticker shock. The additional fees (all per person and in U.S. dollars): Discovery Fee: $250. It’s described as a contribution to local projects in the areas in which Adventure Canada travels. But it’s billed to you. Credit card pricing: $160. If you use a credit card, you’ll have to pay more — $4,155 for the cheapest Greenland Wild Labrador fare instead of $3,Schedule for Sub Pop’s Silver Jubilee is set,995 if you pay by cash or check. Yes, you could avoid the extra charge by not using a credit card,Liverpool 7 Suarez red jerseys, but I’d never pay for a tour/cruise with cash or check. If you pay by credit card there is protection under federal fair credit laws in case a company goes bankrupt or doesn’t deliver what was promised; you don’t have such protections when paying by cash or check. The Aurora Borealis glows in the sky in the Greenland town of Kangerlussuaq. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images, 2007) Mandatory medical evacuation insurance: About $250 (for trip cancellation and medical/evacuation insurance,Nike Steelers 94 TIMMONS Black Women Game Jerseys, varies depending on the passenger’s age).?? OK, fair enough,Jim Hightower's Common Sense, to require medical insurance (which usually comes bundled with other protections). Otherwise it could cost a traveler thousands of dollars to be evacuated and stick the cruise line with the arrangements. Still, it adds up. Fuel surcharges: Not specified,Pioneer Square’s indoor national park, but they can be imposed. Tips: $210. The cruise line suggests a gratuity of $15 per passenger per day. Many big cruise lines automatically add gratuities to your bill, other cruise lines “suggest” it and you feel like a heel if you don’t tip. What about paying ship staff a living wage and not sticking passengers for tips? ???? So before even considering the cost of any optional shore excursions, I was looking at more than $850 in extras. Ouch. ?The moral of the story: Add up the extra fees — so prevalent?in the travel business?these days — before you buy so you know the true price.</html>
Civil Disagreement- Egypt, and America’s interest
<html>The military overthrow of the elected civilian government in Egypt a very unpopular government of the Muslim Brotherhood has left the U.S. government in the position of feeling powerless while being blamed for exercising power. What should Americans think of this? Editorial board members Bruce Ramsey and Lynne K. Varner have their own takes on it.
Lynne, I’m tired of America’s interference in places like Egypt. Americans don’t get this. We’re used to being No. 1, the top dog,Poll- Should Washington lawmakers fine themselves for workin, the people who get to manage the Earth. But we don’t have a right to that authority; we have let the academics and politicians who itch for the joys of global management talk us into believing we have a moral duty to do it. Foreigners think Americans do it because there is profit in it. Sometimes there is, but there are also losses. To my understanding, Egypt has been the No. 1 recipient of U.S. government aid, or No. 2 after Israel, since the Jimmy Carter administration. What benefit did the U.S. taxpayer get for that? That Egypt didn’t attack Israel? Last time Egypt attacked Israel, in 1973, the Egyptian army had its pants pulled down. Also,Jets 10 Holmes green womens Jerseys, Israel has nuclear weapons. I could be totally mistaken,[2], but I’ll hazard to assert that Egypt does not need to be bribed to let Israel alone. And if it did, who should pay that bribe, eh? Look at where this aid gets Americans. Our government underwrites Egypt’s military. Egypt has an election: Democracy! Yay! Arab Spring! Whoopee! The Muslim Brotherhood is elected to power, promising to have an inclusive government. Well, it lied. It isn’t inclusive. It demonizes its opponents as traitors. Three years in, Egyptians don’t want that government any more. Egypt’s military, with all its U.S. tanks and guns, takes over in a coup. What happened is all the valuable influence bought by U.S. aid? The New York Times reports frustration at the White House because of “lack of leverage the United States has over Egypt.” Our ambassador there, Anne Patterson, an official almost no American has heard of,Mets 57 santana cream(blue strip)cool base jerseys, is a huge public figure in Egypt, her face on signs, crossed out as if she were Satan. Says the New York Times, she is “a symbol for angry young Egyptians of America’s meddlesome role in their country’s affairs.” Has the U.S. government been meddlesome? Yup. And what is the U.S. government’s attitude toward the coup? We’re Americans. We don’t believe in military coups. We believe in elections, and civilian government. Ambassador Patterson said she was “deeply skeptical” that “street action will produce better results than elections.” As an American, what else could she say? That put her against the people in the street. But the U.S. government was also deeply skeptical of the Muslim Brotherhood government, because it was run by zealots who didn’t like liberty or democracy or United States. Result: The U.S. ambassador's face is crossed out by both sides. The goal of U.S. foreign policy should be the advancement of the legitimate interests of the United States. To me that means the protection of American citizens in Egypt, and in the neighborhood of Egypt, and of some rules for trade, investment, intellectual property, fishing rights, tourism, educational exchanges, extradition, etc., between Egypt and the United States. Our government has taken a much more vague and permissive view of what American interests are in Egypt and other places,Mariners to make rotation change soon after Jeremy Bonderman, and what sorts of things our politicians, and our military, are allowed to do in pursuit of these amorphous interests. People with power like to use it, and will embrace political language that allows them to do what they want. One of those chocolate bars of permissive language is “nation-building.” I don’t think it is part of the U.S. government’s job to go around the world building nations. I’m just a narrow-minded isolationist that way, Lynne. I look at this and think, “not our business.” ?We didn’t like it when the British were nation-building here, with their taxes and their redcoats, and we killed a bunch of them back in the 1770s and 1780s until they left us alone. It was a glorious thing, and last Thursday we celebrated it with fireworks. We wanted the British, and all the other European powers, out. Should we be surprised that the Egyptians want the American government out? I’d want it out, if I were Egyptian. I remember when the Philippines closed the U.S. bases at Clark Field and Subic Bay. They wanted the Americans out, not because they hated America (they don’t) or hated democracy (they don’t), but because it was their country and they didn’t want the former imperial power interfering with their politics (which we did). They kicked us out, and see if you can find a Filipino who regrets it.</html>